![new mac pro 2019 benchmarks new mac pro 2019 benchmarks](https://www.macstoreuk.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Screenshot-2021-06-15-at-21.22.23-1024x1007.png)
![new mac pro 2019 benchmarks new mac pro 2019 benchmarks](http://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/zS458mNEfEwUtP7Ujr5mWD.jpg)
The new 12 core macPro would be my choice today if I were going to buy a new mac in 2020. The new 28core is way overkill for what we do and would be a tremendous waste of money! I even happen to think the 16 core is a diminishing return. That's the beauty of them going back to the modular design.
#New mac pro 2019 benchmarks upgrade#
Personally, after seeing how well this machine easily handles older projects of mine that used to absolutely choke my 8 core trashcan, I think it's safe to say that I'm probably good for at *least* 7 years, at which point I'll just upgrade my CPU. Is the 8 core the sweet spot? Are the clock speeds too slow on the 12 core? Etc. However, I know that there was a similar debate back when the trashcan Mac Pro's were coming out. If you require more horsepower than what I ran in this test, then you might want to consider either getting the 24/28 core, or just not buying the Mac Pro at all and instead going with a super-beast hackintosh/PC.Īll that being said, after seeing how well this machine easily handles older projects of mine that used to absolutely choke my 8 core trashcan, I think it's safe to say that I'm probably good for at *least* 7 years, at which point I'll just upgrade my CPU. Personally, I'll likely never run a project with 80 instances of the 2C-B2 (let alone 80 instances of Omnisphere). I'm no expert when it comes to judging that sort of thing, though, so take that with a grain of salt. Some people like to run projects at a buffer of 64 or even 32, however, so in those instances, maybe there would be a performance difference due to the lower clock speeds of the 28 core. Is the 8 core the sweet spot? Are the clock speeds too slow on the 12 core? Etc.įrom what I saw looking back, my friends who owned the 12 core trashcan were able to run larger projects with more plugins than I could with my 8 core, so I think it's safe to say that if you were to get the 28 core, you'd be more than fine. Cheers.Ĭlick to expand.I have no idea, tbh. I hope to see more results from you guys. Even still, every older project of mine that used to bring my 8 core trashcan to its knees is basically nothing for this machine, so I'm pretty happy. If I can find a way to get the machine to boost its base clock speed during heavier loads, that'd be absolutely HUGE. I'm curious as to why I'm not seeing the CPU turbo to anywhere near its max (4.4gHz). Library: Kontakt 6 - Metropolis Ark 1 "High Strings Spiccato Unison" with the default 2 mic positions I've already posted a couple different videos of tests I've run (first two videos - test conditions in the description), but here's another (third video).īuffer: 256 (EDIT: originally thought it was 512) (ASIO buffer set to High) I'm hoping this will help some of you that are on the fence with the nMP make a decision.
#New mac pro 2019 benchmarks free#
Also, feel free to suggest different tests and I'll do my best to accommodate. For anyone else who has decided to take the plunge and pick up one of the new machines, feel free to post your machine specs and performance results here as well.
![new mac pro 2019 benchmarks new mac pro 2019 benchmarks](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/TnGAJi3gCdk/maxresdefault.jpg)
I figured it would be easier to keep track of the different DAW benchmarks/stress tests for the new Mac Pro in one thread rather than randomly throwing them in other Mac Pro related topics, breaking up whatever the current conversation was.